• Title: Art and Objects
    Author: Graham Harman
    Publication Year: 2019


    In Art and Objects, Graham Harman explores a radical shift in how we conceive of objects. Moving beyond an anthropocentric perspective, he invites us to see objects not merely as tools or experiences defined by human use, but as entities with their own autonomous existence. This approach significantly broadens the way we understand "objects," extending the concept to encompass anything that withdraws from complete access — whether physical, conceptual, or otherwise. It is a fascinating invitation to decenter the human and engage with a richer, deeper ontology of things.



  • -


  • Title: The Intimacy of the House: The Individual Space in Domestic Architecture in the 20th Century
    Author: Ana Sofia Pereira da Silva
    Publication Year: 2013
    Institution: Department of Architectural Projects, Higher Technical School of Architecture
    Supervisors: Doctor Architects María Teresa Muñoz and Fernando Quesada


    This doctoral thesis investigates the historical evolution of the concepts of intimacy and individual space within domestic architecture throughout the 20th century. Through a detailed analysis, the work highlights how the home has been shaped as a private refuge, reflecting broader social, cultural, and architectural transformations. The thesis is notable for its thorough bibliographic research and presents a study worthy of careful and reflective reading, especially for those interested in exploring the extensive references provided.



    Title: Untimely Objects: Philosophy and Archaeology Oriented Toward Objects
    Authors: Graham Harman, Christopher Witmore
    Publication Year: 2012


  • In Untimely Objects, Graham Harman and Christopher Witmore offer a thought-provoking reflection that challenges one of the most ingrained ideas in philosophy and in our worldview: the notion that humans are the center of everything. Through a critique of the anthropocentric view, the authors invite us to reconsider our relationship with objects and to see them as entities with their own existence, independent of our perception. Instead of viewing objects only in terms of their utility to humans, the book proposes that they have an existence that goes beyond our capacity to interact with them. It’s a challenging perspective that questions the way we understand the world and reminds us that there is much more to it than we often recognize. 







  • Title: The Usefulness of the Useless
    Author: Nuccio Ordine
    Publication Year: 2009


    The Usefulness of the Useless is a book recommended to me by my friend Lucía, designer who, like Ordine, appreciates what goes beyond immediate usefulness. In this work, Nuccio Ordine reflects on what we often consider "useless" and how, in reality, it holds deep and essential value for our lives. The author challenges our obsession with efficiency and utility, reminding us that knowledge, art, and beauty do not always need to serve a practical purpose to be valuable. It is a book that invites us to reconsider our relationship with the world, culture, and knowledge, and challenges us to accept the difficulty of understanding "uselessness" as a fundamental part of the essence of life. In a world so focused on productivity, The Usefulness of the Useless makes us think about what truly matters—what cannot be measured or calculated, but that connects us to what is most human and transcendent.


  • Title: The Blue Rider Almanac
    Authors: Wassily Kandinsky & Franz Marc (editors)
    Publication Year: 1912

  • The idea that objects — including furniture — can have a spiritual dimension is fascinating to me, and The Blue Rider, with Kandinsky at the forefront, touches on that point even if it's not the main focus. Kandinsky believed that any artistic object, if it comes from a genuine "inner necessity," can have a kind of spiritual power. It’s not just about whether something is beautiful or useful, but whether it expresses something — if it has soul.

    And that really changes how you see things. Because then art isn’t just in museums or “big” works — it can also exist in the everyday. A piece of furniture, a lamp, even a mug can carry meaning if it's made with care and intention, if the creator put something of themselves into it. Kandinsky even says that “the artist is a priest,” like creating is almost a sacred act.

    Applied to design, that makes me think an object becomes spiritual when it stops being just functional and manages to create a deeper connection with the person using it. It's not just about style or purpose — it’s about intention. And when that’s present, even the simplest things can become art.



  • Title: La Distinction
    Author: Pierre Bourdieu
    Publication Year: 1979 (original in French: La Distinction)

    Lately I’ve been reading Bourdieu, and I can’t stop thinking about how his sociological analysis intertwines with design, consumption, and the way we inhabit objects.

    He speaks of time as symbolic capital. Not everyone has the same relationship to it. Dominant classes can afford to use it for cultural leisure, contemplation, or learning. That time is also a luxury, a privilege.

    He also introduces the idea of two cultural markets. The legitimate market, supported by criticism, institutions, and academia; and the popular market, driven by commercial success, immediate pleasure, and emotional appeal. There's a constant tension between the two. One accuses the other of being vulgar, the other replies that the first is pretentious. And yet, both are meaningful. It made me think deeply about how the objects we design or consume are shaped by these invisible struggles. Are we designing for symbolic recognition, or to reach as many people as possible? What is valued more —and by whom?

    Another concept that struck me is the “universe of the possible.” Not everyone imagines the same options. Our history, our environment, and our social position shape what we believe to be desirable, legitimate, or even attainable. This has profound implications in design as well: not everyone accesses, understands, or feels called by certain aesthetics or objects. Some codes are designed to exclude.

    All of this makes me feel that designing is not just about creating beautiful things, but about taking a position within a system of signs,
    of visibilities, of symbolic struggles. And that, at the very least, is political.

    It’s a dense read, yes. Perhaps not something to read straight through, but rather to turn to when you want to sharpen your gaze.
    But it’s incredibly useful.

    To be honest, it’s sparked some internal debates for me about the concept of beauty.
    As Kant says, should beauty be innate? Or is it entirely a construct?